Closing the Conservation Gap in the Sagebrush Biome: Spatial Targeting and Exceptional Coordination are Needed for Conservation Efforts to Keep Pace with Ecosystem Losses
June 13, 2024

The State of the Sagebrush: Implementing the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Save a Biome

The State of the Biome

Key Findings: The sagebrush biome is one of the most intact and least modified ecosystems in the world, on par with the Amazon or the Serengeti. It’s also the largest contiguous open space in the Lower 48, but we are losing 1.3 million acres each year. The status quo will not suffice and needs to be replaced with the strategic game plan. This introductory chapter outlines how the 20 chapters in this special issue can use the Sagebrush Conservation Design to develop a cohesive strategy to simultaneously address multiple ecosystem threats.

Authors

Kevin E. Doherty* 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood, Colorado & USDA Forest Service, Forest Service Research and Development, Missoula, Montana

Jeremy D. Maestas

USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, West National Technology Support Center, Portland, Oregon

Thomas E. Remington

Former WAFWA Sagebrush Science Coordinator

David E. Naugle

W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana

Chad S. Boyd

USDA Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, Oregon

Lief A. Wiechman

U.S Geological Survey, Ecosystems Mission Area, Reston, Virginia

Geoffrey Bedrosian

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood, Colorado

Matthew Cahill

The Nature Conservancy, Bend, Oregon

Peter. S. Coates

U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon, California

Michele R. Crist

Bureau of Land Management, Fire and Aviation, National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, Idaho

Martin C. Holdrege

U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona & Northern Arizona University, Center for Adaptable Western Landscapes, Flagstaff, Arizona

Alexander V. Kumar

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado

Tina Mozelewski

Conservation Science Partners, Truckee, California

Rory C. O'Connor

USDA Agricultural Research Service, Range and Meadow Forage Research Unit, Burns, Oregon

Elisa M. Olimpi

Conservation Science Partners, Truckee, California

Andrew Olsen

Intermountain West Joint Venture, Missoula, Montana

Brian G. Prochazka

U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon, California

Jason R. Reinhardt

USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, Idaho

Joseph T. Smith

Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana

William D. Sparklin

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Highwood, Montana

David M. Theobold

Conservation Planning Technologies, Fort Collins, Colorado & Colorado State University, Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Fort Collins, Colorado

Katherine Wollstein

Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, Oregon

*Lead Author

Abstract and Keywords

Abstract: This special issue of Rangeland Ecology and Management is dedicated to applying the Sagebrush Conservation Design (SCD) to improve conservation outcomes across the sagebrush biome in the face of pervasive ecosystem threats. This special issue provides new science and real-world examples of how we can implement the SCD to save a biome. The SCD is a tool to identify intact sagebrush areas and address the largest threats to the ecosystem. The SCD focuses on first protecting intact and functioning sagebrush ecosystems, called Core Sagebrush Areas, then works outward toward more degraded areas (i.e., “Defend the Core”). The premise behind the Defend the Core approach is simple: focus resources first on preventative actions that retain ecosystem services in Core Sagebrush Areas because they are more cost-effective and more likely to be successful. The opening article of this special issue creates a foundation for the 19 following papers, providing a coherent path for implementing the SCD. The overarching themes are: 1) Business-As-Usual Won't Save the Sagebrush Sea, 2) Better Spatial Targeting Can Improve Outcomes, 3) Conservation Planning is Needed to Develop Realistic Business Plans, 4) Targeted Ecosystem Management: Monitoring Shows Managing for Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Working, 5) Maintaining Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Ecologically Relevant, and 6) There is Only Hope if We Manage Change. The collective articles show that there is no shared plan to save the biome, yet a business plan for the biome could ensure realistic goals. The sagebrush biome still has vast expanses of open spaces with high ecological integrity at a scale that is rare in other ecological systems within the lower 48 states. If we focus on the common ground of the main drivers of ecosystem change, implementing the SCD and Defending the Core are viable strategies to help save a biome.

Keywords: Conservation planning; Conifer encroachment; Defend the Core; Invasive Annual Grass; Sagebrush Conservation Design; Sagebrush Ecological Integrity

Citation

K.E. Doherty, J. Maestas, T. Remington, D.E. Naugle, C. Boyd, L. Wiechman, G. Bedrosian, M. Cahill, P. Coates, M. Crist, M.C. Holdrege, A.V. Kumar, T. Mozelewski, R.C. O'Connor, E.M. Olimpi, A. Olsen, B.G. Prochazka, J.R. Reinhardt, J.T. Smith, W.D. Sparklin, D.M. Theobald, K. Wollstein, “State of the Sagebrush: Implementing the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Save a Biome,” Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 97, 2024, Pages 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.08.017

2024 Researcher Presentation

Watch Kevin E. Doherty's presentation about this article from the Sagebrush Conservation Design Symposia at the 2024 Society for Range Management conference.

Article Contributor Affiliations

We wanted a common vision that worked for all of us. So, we started from the ground up and we said what are the components of the habitat that support the wildlife, what are the components of the habitat that support the local communities, and what are the biggest threats to that. And that shared vision allows us to expand the tent and focus on interests and not positions.

- Kevin E. Doherty

Explore the Research

The special issue of Rangeland Ecology & Management is broken into six themes outlined below. Each theme includes several articles. Navigate through the articles using the layout below by hovering and clicking on the dots at the bottom of each block (each dot is linked to an article that falls within that theme). A complete list of the articles (with links) is also included on the Explore the Research page.

START HERE: THE STATE OF THE SAGEBRUSH

THEME 1
Business-As-Usual Won’t Work to Save the Sagebrush Sea

THEME 2
Better Spatial Targeting Can Improve Outcomes

THEME 3
Conservation Planning is Needed to Develop Realistic Business Plans

THEME 4
Targeted Ecosystem Management: Monitoring Shows Managing for Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Working

THEME 5
Maintaining Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Ecologically Relevant

THEME 6
There is Only Hope if We Manage Change

The State of the Sagebrush: Implementing the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Save a Biome
Closing the Conservation Gap in the Sagebrush Biome: Spatial Targeting and Exceptional Coordination are Needed for Conservation Efforts to Keep Pace with Ecosystem Losses
Climate Change Amplifies Ongoing Declines of Sagebrush Ecological Integrity
Well-connected Core Areas Retain Ecological Integrity of Sagebrush Ecosystems Amidst Overall Declines from 2001-2021
A Spatial Prioritization of Conifer Management to Defend and Grow Sagebrush Cores
A Strategic and Science-based Framework for Management of Invasive Annual Grasses in the Sagebrush Biome
Modeling Cropland Conversion Risk to Scale-up Averted Loss of Core Sagebrush Rangelands
Will It Burn? Characterizing Wildfire Risk for the Sagebrush Conservation Design
An Assessment of Conservation Opportunities within Sagebrush Ecosystems of U.S. National Parks and Wildlife Refuges
An Interactive Tool to Promote Stepping Down the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Local Conservation Planning
From a Bird to a Biome: Do Sage Grouse Initiative Efforts Contribute to Conservation of the Sagebrush Ecosystem?
Using Satellite Remote Sensing to Assess Shrubland Vegetation Responses to Largescale Juniper Removal in the Northern Great Basin
Cooperative Conservation Actions Improve Sage-Grouse Population Performance within the Bi-State Distinct Population Segment
Evaluating the Sagebrush Conservation Design Strategy through the Performance of a Sagebrush Indicator Species
Defend and Grow the Core for Birds: How a Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Benefits Rangeland Birds
The Carbon Security Index: A Novel Approach to Assessing How Secure Carbon Is in Sagebrush Ecosystems within the Great Basin
Crossing the Chasm: Using Technical Transfer to Bridge Science Production and Management Action
Assessing Conservation Readiness: The Where, Who, and How of Strategic Conservation in the Sagebrush Biome
Where Do We Go from Here with Sagebrush Conservation: A Long-Term Perspective?
There is No Hope Without Change: A Perspective on How We Conserve the Sagebrush Biome

START HERE: THE STATE OF THE SAGEBRUSH

THEME 1
Business-As-Usual Won’t Work to Save the Sagebrush Sea

THEME 2
Better Spatial Targeting Can Improve Outcomes

THEME 3
Conservation Planning is Needed to Develop Realistic Business Plans

THEME 4
Targeted Ecosystem Management: Monitoring Shows Managing for Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Working

THEME 5
Maintaining Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Ecologically Relevant

THEME 6
There is Only Hope if We Manage Change

The State of the Sagebrush: Implementing the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Save a Biome
Closing the Conservation Gap in the Sagebrush Biome: Spatial Targeting and Exceptional Coordination are Needed for Conservation Efforts to Keep Pace with Ecosystem Losses
Climate Change Amplifies Ongoing Declines of Sagebrush Ecological Integrity
Well-connected Core Areas Retain Ecological Integrity of Sagebrush Ecosystems Amidst Overall Declines from 2001-2021
A Spatial Prioritization of Conifer Management to Defend and Grow Sagebrush Cores
A Strategic and Science-based Framework for Management of Invasive Annual Grasses in the Sagebrush Biome
Modeling Cropland Conversion Risk to Scale-up Averted Loss of Core Sagebrush Rangelands
Will It Burn? Characterizing Wildfire Risk for the Sagebrush Conservation Design
An Assessment of Conservation Opportunities within Sagebrush Ecosystems of U.S. National Parks and Wildlife Refuges
An Interactive Tool to Promote Stepping Down the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Local Conservation Planning
From a Bird to a Biome: Do Sage Grouse Initiative Efforts Contribute to Conservation of the Sagebrush Ecosystem?
Using Satellite Remote Sensing to Assess Shrubland Vegetation Responses to Largescale Juniper Removal in the Northern Great Basin
Cooperative Conservation Actions Improve Sage-Grouse Population Performance within the Bi-State Distinct Population Segment
Evaluating the Sagebrush Conservation Design Strategy through the Performance of a Sagebrush Indicator Species
Defend and Grow the Core for Birds: How a Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Benefits Rangeland Birds
The Carbon Security Index: A Novel Approach to Assessing How Secure Carbon Is in Sagebrush Ecosystems within the Great Basin
Crossing the Chasm: Using Technical Transfer to Bridge Science Production and Management Action
Operationalizing Strategic Conservation: A Multi-level Framework to Identify Opportunities and Actions
Where Do We Go from Here with Sagebrush Conservation: A Long-Term Perspective?
There is No Hope Without Change: A Perspective on How We Conserve the Sagebrush Biome