A Spatial Prioritization of Conifer Management to Defend and Grow Sagebrush Cores
June 14, 2024
Modeling Cropland Conversion Risk to Scale-Up Averted Loss of Core Sagebrush Rangelands
June 14, 2024

A Strategic and Science-Based Framework for Management of Invasive Annual Grasses in the Sagebrush Biome

Managing Invasive Annual Grasses in the Sagebrush Biome

Key Findings: This paper presents a strategic spatial game plan for invasive annual grass management, identifying areas for maintaining relatively intact plant communities with the most to lose, improving impacted plant communities where treatments are most likely to be successful, and containing infestations where improvement may not be possible. This framework helps us move away from reactive and opportunity-driven management and embrace a paradigm of proactive and strategic conservation of sagebrush rangelands at risk from invasive annual grasses.

Authors

Chad S. Boyd *

USDA Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, Oregon

Matthew Cahill

The Nature Conservancy, Bend, Oregon

Megan K. Creutzburg

Oregon State University, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland, Oregon

Stella M. Copeland

USDA Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, Oregon

Alexander V. Kumar

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, Colorado

Cameron A. Duquette

The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, Burns, Oregon

Joseph T. Smith

Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana

Lindy Garner

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Falls, Montana

Kevin E. Doherty

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Science Applications, Evergreen, Colorado & USDA Forest Service Research and Development, Missoula, Montana

Martin C. Holdrege

U.S. Geological Survey, Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center & Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona

Brian A. Mealor

University of Wyoming, Institute for Managing Annual Grasses Invading Natural Ecosystems, Sheridan, Wyoming

William D. Sparklin

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Falls, Montana

John B. Bradford

U.S. Geological Survey, Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center & Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, Arizona

Todd B. Cross

Crosswinds Ecological Consulting, LLC, Hartland, Vermont & Fedy Wildlife and Molecular Ecology Lab, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

*Lead Author

Abstract and Keywords

Abstract: In the last 20 years, the North American sagebrush biome has lost over 500 000 ha of intact and largely intact sagebrush plant communities on an annual basis. Much of this loss has been associated with expansion and infilling of invasive annual grasses (IAGs). These species are highly competitive against native perennial grasses in disturbed environments, and create fuel conditions that increase both the likelihood of fire ignition and the ease of wildfire spread across large landscapes. Given the current rate of IAG expansion in both burned and unburned rangelands, we propose a range-wide paradigm shift from opportunistic and reactive management, to a framework that spatially prioritizes maintenance of largely intact, uninvaded areas and improvement of invaded habitats in strategic locations. We created a framework accompanied by biome-wide priority maps using geospatial overlays that target areas to MAINTAIN large, uninvaded areas as natural resource anchors through activities to prevent IAGs, IMPROVE areas where management success in restoring large, intact landscapes is most likely, and CONTAIN IAG infestations where necessary. We then offer three case studies to illustrate the use of these concepts and map products at multiple scales. Our map products operate at the biome scale using regional data sources and additional data sources will be needed to inform local conservation planning. However, the basic strategic management principles of (1) maintaining the intact and uninvaded areas that we can least afford to lose to IAGs, (2) improving areas where we have a reasonable likelihood of restoration success, and (3) containing problems where we must, are timely, relevant, and scalable from the biome to local levels.

Keywords: Strategic management; Prevention; Restoration

Citation

Chad S. Boyd, Megan K. Creutzburg, Alexander V. Kumar, Joseph T. Smith, Kevin E. Doherty, Brian A. Mealor, John B. Bradford, Matthew Cahill, Stella M. Copeland, Cameron A. Duquette, Lindy Garner, Martin C. Holdrege, Bill Sparklin, Todd B. Cross, "A Strategic and Science-Based Framework for Management of Invasive Annual Grasses in the Sagebrush Biome," Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 97, 2024, Pages 61-72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.08.019

2024 Researcher Presentation

Watch Chad S. Boyd’s presentation about this article from the Sagebrush Conservation Design Symposia at the 2024 Society for Range Management conference.

Article Contributor Affiliations

We now have the tools to figure out what it is that we should do if we want to be strategic in combatting annual grasses, and we have to be strategic. When it comes to annual grasses, strategic conservation is all about maintaining those areas where you have the most to lose, improving those areas where it’s possible, where you have the highest chance of success, and containing problems where needed.

- Chad S. Boyd

Explore the Research

The special issue of Rangeland Ecology & Management is broken into six themes outlined below. Each theme includes several articles. Navigate through the articles using the layout below by hovering and clicking on the dots at the bottom of each block (each dot is linked to an article that falls within that theme). A complete list of the articles (with links) is also included on the Explore the Research page.

START HERE: THE STATE OF THE SAGEBRUSH

THEME 1
Business-As-Usual Won’t Work to Save the Sagebrush Sea

THEME 2
Better Spatial Targeting Can Improve Outcomes

THEME 3
Conservation Planning is Needed to Develop Realistic Business Plans

THEME 4
Targeted Ecosystem Management: Monitoring Shows Managing for Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Working

THEME 5
Maintaining Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Ecologically Relevant

THEME 6
There is Only Hope if We Manage Change

The State of the Sagebrush: Implementing the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Save a Biome
Closing the Conservation Gap in the Sagebrush Biome: Spatial Targeting and Exceptional Coordination are Needed for Conservation Efforts to Keep Pace with Ecosystem Losses
Climate Change Amplifies Ongoing Declines of Sagebrush Ecological Integrity
Well-connected Core Areas Retain Ecological Integrity of Sagebrush Ecosystems Amidst Overall Declines from 2001-2021
A Spatial Prioritization of Conifer Management to Defend and Grow Sagebrush Cores
A Strategic and Science-based Framework for Management of Invasive Annual Grasses in the Sagebrush Biome
Modeling Cropland Conversion Risk to Scale-up Averted Loss of Core Sagebrush Rangelands
Will It Burn? Characterizing Wildfire Risk for the Sagebrush Conservation Design
An Assessment of Conservation Opportunities within Sagebrush Ecosystems of U.S. National Parks and Wildlife Refuges
An Interactive Tool to Promote Stepping Down the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Local Conservation Planning
From a Bird to a Biome: Do Sage Grouse Initiative Efforts Contribute to Conservation of the Sagebrush Ecosystem?
Using Satellite Remote Sensing to Assess Shrubland Vegetation Responses to Largescale Juniper Removal in the Northern Great Basin
Cooperative Conservation Actions Improve Sage-Grouse Population Performance within the Bi-State Distinct Population Segment
Evaluating the Sagebrush Conservation Design Strategy through the Performance of a Sagebrush Indicator Species
Defend and Grow the Core for Birds: How a Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Benefits Rangeland Birds
The Carbon Security Index: A Novel Approach to Assessing How Secure Carbon Is in Sagebrush Ecosystems within the Great Basin
Crossing the Chasm: Using Technical Transfer to Bridge Science Production and Management Action
Assessing Conservation Readiness: The Where, Who, and How of Strategic Conservation in the Sagebrush Biome
Where Do We Go from Here with Sagebrush Conservation: A Long-Term Perspective?
There is No Hope Without Change: A Perspective on How We Conserve the Sagebrush Biome

START HERE: THE STATE OF THE SAGEBRUSH

THEME 1
Business-As-Usual Won’t Work to Save the Sagebrush Sea

THEME 2
Better Spatial Targeting Can Improve Outcomes

THEME 3
Conservation Planning is Needed to Develop Realistic Business Plans

THEME 4
Targeted Ecosystem Management: Monitoring Shows Managing for Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Working

THEME 5
Maintaining Sagebrush Ecological Integrity is Ecologically Relevant

THEME 6
There is Only Hope if We Manage Change

The State of the Sagebrush: Implementing the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Save a Biome
Closing the Conservation Gap in the Sagebrush Biome: Spatial Targeting and Exceptional Coordination are Needed for Conservation Efforts to Keep Pace with Ecosystem Losses
Climate Change Amplifies Ongoing Declines of Sagebrush Ecological Integrity
Well-connected Core Areas Retain Ecological Integrity of Sagebrush Ecosystems Amidst Overall Declines from 2001-2021
A Spatial Prioritization of Conifer Management to Defend and Grow Sagebrush Cores
A Strategic and Science-based Framework for Management of Invasive Annual Grasses in the Sagebrush Biome
Modeling Cropland Conversion Risk to Scale-up Averted Loss of Core Sagebrush Rangelands
Will It Burn? Characterizing Wildfire Risk for the Sagebrush Conservation Design
An Assessment of Conservation Opportunities within Sagebrush Ecosystems of U.S. National Parks and Wildlife Refuges
An Interactive Tool to Promote Stepping Down the Sagebrush Conservation Design to Local Conservation Planning
From a Bird to a Biome: Do Sage Grouse Initiative Efforts Contribute to Conservation of the Sagebrush Ecosystem?
Using Satellite Remote Sensing to Assess Shrubland Vegetation Responses to Largescale Juniper Removal in the Northern Great Basin
Cooperative Conservation Actions Improve Sage-Grouse Population Performance within the Bi-State Distinct Population Segment
Evaluating the Sagebrush Conservation Design Strategy through the Performance of a Sagebrush Indicator Species
Defend and Grow the Core for Birds: How a Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Benefits Rangeland Birds
The Carbon Security Index: A Novel Approach to Assessing How Secure Carbon Is in Sagebrush Ecosystems within the Great Basin
Crossing the Chasm: Using Technical Transfer to Bridge Science Production and Management Action
Operationalizing Strategic Conservation: A Multi-level Framework to Identify Opportunities and Actions
Where Do We Go from Here with Sagebrush Conservation: A Long-Term Perspective?
There is No Hope Without Change: A Perspective on How We Conserve the Sagebrush Biome